Axe Net Zero!

What is the purpose of so-called “Net Zero”? Well, I believe it has three core aims;

1. To deindustrialise the West. Think the new Dark Ages but with heat pumps that don’t warm your house.

2. To gain much more control over all our freedoms. No more instant access to Energy for you naughty people.

3. To make vast amounts of £££GRIFT££ for all those “in” on the insane renewables” con.

Did you see the milquetoast Kemi Badenoch came out yesterday and made some meek remarks about probably not going for “Net Zero” by 2050.

Tory leader Kemi Badenoch has dismayed green Conservatives by declaring the UK's target to reach net zero by 2050 "impossible".

She’s wrong. It’s not JUST that it is impossible but it’s totally undesirable! That said, even that mild dissent triggered the truly awful Theresa May!

Retorting that “net zero by 2050 is challenging but achievable”, Baroness May wrote on social media: “It is supported by the scientific community and backed by the independent Climate Change Committee as being not just necessary but feasible and cost-effective.

Lol, sure, Margaret. Whatever.

And May wasn’t the only fake Conservative to pipe up on the issue! Up pops little Willy Hague.

Lord Hague warned she risk making a “mistake” by jettisoning plans to get to net zero without coming up with alternative proposals to tackle global warming.

He also stressed that her move threatens to leave the impression that the Conservatives were not “serious” about addressing climate change.

May and Hague are globalist vermin so we can’t be surprised at them baulking at even mild dissent. Labour are deeply committed to Net Zero and insists that we MUST decarbonise by 2050 with many targets after 2030.

Here are three dirty little secrets that the Net Zero cult don’t want to talk about:

1. We need MORE CO2, not less. It is the gas of life and our planet will benefit from more.

2. If we sacrifice our national Economy to the eco cult, and actually do what they want, it still means NOTHING in global terms. It’s the ultimate act of national self harm!

3. Renewables are impractical, inconsistent and eye watering expenditure. In the future, if THAT is our primary energy source, then it’s lights out when the wind don’t blow and there is no sunshine!

If you enjoy all the content that I put out here, can I ask you to consider to becoming a PAID subscriber, it’s only £5 a month, you can cancel if you don’t enjoy it but I know you will. I want to thank the kind people who already do this, without your help this becomes impossible. Thank you in anticipation.