There’s been a lot of outrage over the news that Axel Rudakabuna, the convicted killer of the three little girls in Southport back in summer 2024, has been transferred from the relative austerity of HMP Belmarsh to the relative opulence of Broadmoor psychiatric prison.
His parents especially Father, should never have been allowed here. His father should be jailed for his actions too!
Alphonse Rudakubana, the father of Southport mass-murderer Axel Rudakubana, does not face criminal charges, as Merseyside Police confirmed there is no legal duty for parents to report criminality. However, following the conclusion of the official Southport Public Inquiry, he and the killer's mother have been publicly accused of "catastrophic" moral and parental failures that directly enabled the tragedy.
The specific failures and actions Alphonse Rudakubana was accused of during the inquiry include:
1. Actively Concealing Weapons and Warning SignsHiding a Machete: The inquiry revealed that Alphonse intercepted a package containing a machete that his son had ordered online. Instead of alerting the police, he simply hid it on top of a wardrobe.Withholding Poison Information: The inquiry found the parents knew Axel was accessing "chilling" violent material online and was actively manufacturing poison in his bedroom, but they failed to report it to counter-terrorism or local authorities.
2. Obstructing State Agencies and SafeguardingSilencing Social Workers: Evidence showed the father sent messages to family wellbeing services demanding they keep quiet and stop sharing information about Axel’s volatile behaviour with other agencies. Undermining School Interventions: Inquiry lawyers accused Alphonse of actively pushing back against school authorities. When Axel was expelled from school for bringing a knife to class, his father resisted the decision and argued with police officers who brought the teenager home in handcuffs.
Blocking Home Visits: He warned specialist school teachers not to conduct home safeguarding checks, telling them his son would become violent if forced to see them.
3. Failure to Act Days Before the Attack. The Taxi Incident: Just a week before the Southport dance class stabbings, Alphonse physically dragged his son out of a taxi because he suspected Axel was travelling to his former school to commit an arson attack. During the confrontation, Axel threatened his father with a knife. Despite this extreme escalation, Alphonse did not call the police. Legal Outcome vs. Public Accountability The Inquiry Report concluded that if Alphonse and his wife had "done what they morally ought to have done," Axel would not have been free to conduct the attack. While the victims' families have publicly called for the parents to be jailed, Merseyside Police ruled out criminal prosecution because the evidence did not meet the strict legal threshold required by the Crown Prosecution Service. In his own testimony, Alphonse Rudakubana apologized to the victims, stating he was "desperately sorry" and accepted his share of responsibility, claiming he had completely lost control of his son and acted out of fear.
So once again, a police failure, lies, when after poor Henry, family members CAN and DID face justice, but a Labour controlled authority, prevented the same justice!
Lots of interesting information there, thank you! I am convinced that the whole family should have been refused entry into the U.K. considering the father’s background in the Rwanda massacres. I don’t have the exact details but I do know it was shady. The big question is, was Starmer involved in letting Alphonse R into Britain?
Believe it or not, i’m tempted to believe, he was part of the group fighting the people carrying out the massacres. I remember the posts saying he was part of the bad lot, but found to be mistaken identity.
I completely agree with you David. However, we have lived in anti White and anti English conditions for decades and that’s why they abolished the death penalty. They had their rule book back then and knew our country was to be flooded with non Whites who mostly hate us thanks for the propaganda pushed by msm etc.
the same players decided that English lives don’t matter as much as the comfort of a monstrous African murderer!
I personally have no problem with bring/allowing anyone in from the commonwealth, i do have a problem with anti Christian people, who force crap upon us. I will never kneel for a foreign lunatic religion. I have respect for CofE, Catholic, Jewish etc. not Islam!
Am thinking they want us to view the Fabian actions as stupidity and failure - but think it is yet another psychological operation that has been too successful to date.
They know exactly what they are doing and that is to cause trauma to the people of the UK who are very accepting of the abuse.
The people need to wake up to the fact our main enemy is government, the won't be voted out even in 3 more years as they are premeditatedly moving closer to EU.
They all need to be arrested and physically removed or nothing will change. Which is why I keep referring to the parallels with 1920s gangsters in America.
At the very least the debate should be reopened with the public allowed a say.
After a lifetime opposed to capital punishment (due to concerns about reliability of evidence/witnesses) my position has reversed recently. Long prison sentences are no longer a sufficient deterrent and the quality of evidence is now much more reliable.
With regard to the moral side of the argument, when dealing with people who have shown they have complete contempt and disregard for their victims lives then it seems appropriate for the punishment to match that.
If the state doesn't have the stomach for that l'm more than happy to do it for them - although l suspect the queue of volunteers would be extremely long
British Justice used to be something that was revered by many across the world.
Today it is not justice at all !!
Horrible way for the justice system and prison system to find ways to by-pass real justice for the victims and their relatives.
This is exactly what that “vigilante” told the judge in that movie.
Although I am not advocating violence of any kind, it looks like sooner or later this is what is going to happen across Europe. People will demand justice and there will be others who will be willing and able to provide that justice.
The attack represented one which was on all of us and our way of life. It follows that there is a public interest in all surrounding facts being released. This should include the names of all psychiatric drugs he was prescribed before he committed the attack. He has forfeit any rights to medical confidentiality. I agree that the death penalty should have been available and imposed. Mercy to the perpetrator is punishment of the victims and their families.
You have no cogent argument so you resort to ad hominem slurs. If you have something to say, put forward a reasoned argument. Otherwise kindly go away.
1. You are illiterate. Why should I listen to you?
2. I don't watch tv news. Why should I listen to you?
3. I am nobody's "love" least of all yours. Why should I listen to you?
4. You do not know me, have never met me and know nothing about me. Why should I listen to you?
5. You use a single name (probably fake), have no photo, no biog, no profile, the comment itself is general enough to be a standard response and couched as an ad hominem insult. Why should I listen to you?
6. You are therefore probably either a bot or a paid agitator. Why should I listen to you?
His parents especially Father, should never have been allowed here. His father should be jailed for his actions too!
Alphonse Rudakubana, the father of Southport mass-murderer Axel Rudakubana, does not face criminal charges, as Merseyside Police confirmed there is no legal duty for parents to report criminality. However, following the conclusion of the official Southport Public Inquiry, he and the killer's mother have been publicly accused of "catastrophic" moral and parental failures that directly enabled the tragedy.
The specific failures and actions Alphonse Rudakubana was accused of during the inquiry include:
1. Actively Concealing Weapons and Warning SignsHiding a Machete: The inquiry revealed that Alphonse intercepted a package containing a machete that his son had ordered online. Instead of alerting the police, he simply hid it on top of a wardrobe.Withholding Poison Information: The inquiry found the parents knew Axel was accessing "chilling" violent material online and was actively manufacturing poison in his bedroom, but they failed to report it to counter-terrorism or local authorities.
2. Obstructing State Agencies and SafeguardingSilencing Social Workers: Evidence showed the father sent messages to family wellbeing services demanding they keep quiet and stop sharing information about Axel’s volatile behaviour with other agencies. Undermining School Interventions: Inquiry lawyers accused Alphonse of actively pushing back against school authorities. When Axel was expelled from school for bringing a knife to class, his father resisted the decision and argued with police officers who brought the teenager home in handcuffs.
Blocking Home Visits: He warned specialist school teachers not to conduct home safeguarding checks, telling them his son would become violent if forced to see them.
3. Failure to Act Days Before the Attack. The Taxi Incident: Just a week before the Southport dance class stabbings, Alphonse physically dragged his son out of a taxi because he suspected Axel was travelling to his former school to commit an arson attack. During the confrontation, Axel threatened his father with a knife. Despite this extreme escalation, Alphonse did not call the police. Legal Outcome vs. Public Accountability The Inquiry Report concluded that if Alphonse and his wife had "done what they morally ought to have done," Axel would not have been free to conduct the attack. While the victims' families have publicly called for the parents to be jailed, Merseyside Police ruled out criminal prosecution because the evidence did not meet the strict legal threshold required by the Crown Prosecution Service. In his own testimony, Alphonse Rudakubana apologized to the victims, stating he was "desperately sorry" and accepted his share of responsibility, claiming he had completely lost control of his son and acted out of fear.
So once again, a police failure, lies, when after poor Henry, family members CAN and DID face justice, but a Labour controlled authority, prevented the same justice!
Lots of interesting information there, thank you! I am convinced that the whole family should have been refused entry into the U.K. considering the father’s background in the Rwanda massacres. I don’t have the exact details but I do know it was shady. The big question is, was Starmer involved in letting Alphonse R into Britain?
Believe it or not, i’m tempted to believe, he was part of the group fighting the people carrying out the massacres. I remember the posts saying he was part of the bad lot, but found to be mistaken identity.
Hang the parents as well. He had to learn it somewhere.
100% when no element of doubt, and any others of the same ilk.
Am beginning to wonder if they are planning to let him go!
You could well be right, nothing surprises me anymore with this weak government.
It really wouldn’t surprise me.
I completely agree with you David. However, we have lived in anti White and anti English conditions for decades and that’s why they abolished the death penalty. They had their rule book back then and knew our country was to be flooded with non Whites who mostly hate us thanks for the propaganda pushed by msm etc.
the same players decided that English lives don’t matter as much as the comfort of a monstrous African murderer!
I personally have no problem with bring/allowing anyone in from the commonwealth, i do have a problem with anti Christian people, who force crap upon us. I will never kneel for a foreign lunatic religion. I have respect for CofE, Catholic, Jewish etc. not Islam!
Amen.
Am thinking they want us to view the Fabian actions as stupidity and failure - but think it is yet another psychological operation that has been too successful to date.
They know exactly what they are doing and that is to cause trauma to the people of the UK who are very accepting of the abuse.
The people need to wake up to the fact our main enemy is government, the won't be voted out even in 3 more years as they are premeditatedly moving closer to EU.
They all need to be arrested and physically removed or nothing will change. Which is why I keep referring to the parallels with 1920s gangsters in America.
Well said Sara!! Agree 💯
It’s part of the moral inversion of the modern liberal state. We no longer believe in salvation.
At the very least the debate should be reopened with the public allowed a say.
After a lifetime opposed to capital punishment (due to concerns about reliability of evidence/witnesses) my position has reversed recently. Long prison sentences are no longer a sufficient deterrent and the quality of evidence is now much more reliable.
With regard to the moral side of the argument, when dealing with people who have shown they have complete contempt and disregard for their victims lives then it seems appropriate for the punishment to match that.
If the state doesn't have the stomach for that l'm more than happy to do it for them - although l suspect the queue of volunteers would be extremely long
Rudakabuna should be left in a bare room with the parents of those murdered three innocent children. Then let real justice commence !
Assuming the parents are decent people, this is more appealing in the theory than the practice.
Most normal people, especially so long after the event, are unlikely to carry out a physical retribution, however much they might want to.
100%.
Do you find now that government departments reflect the best intentions of Orwellian Inversions?
Justice Department is a good one. It's obviously the Injustice Department.
British Justice used to be something that was revered by many across the world.
Today it is not justice at all !!
Horrible way for the justice system and prison system to find ways to by-pass real justice for the victims and their relatives.
This is exactly what that “vigilante” told the judge in that movie.
Although I am not advocating violence of any kind, it looks like sooner or later this is what is going to happen across Europe. People will demand justice and there will be others who will be willing and able to provide that justice.
At this point I fear it is unavoidable.
Yes. Why are we going to spend 13 million pounds to keep this POS alive?
To deliberately waste tax payers money and bankrupt the country - then gand the UK over to the EU is my guess.
I totally agree with you as I'm sure many more do.
When you look at the party, three are fully in support of illegal ingress into the UK, and protest in support of those carrying out these crimes!
Execution after an extended period of torture for him and his family.
The attack represented one which was on all of us and our way of life. It follows that there is a public interest in all surrounding facts being released. This should include the names of all psychiatric drugs he was prescribed before he committed the attack. He has forfeit any rights to medical confidentiality. I agree that the death penalty should have been available and imposed. Mercy to the perpetrator is punishment of the victims and their families.
There is absolutely no doubt that he is guilty of the crime. In this case I agree with you.
You have no cogent argument so you resort to ad hominem slurs. If you have something to say, put forward a reasoned argument. Otherwise kindly go away.
1. You are illiterate. Why should I listen to you?
2. I don't watch tv news. Why should I listen to you?
3. I am nobody's "love" least of all yours. Why should I listen to you?
4. You do not know me, have never met me and know nothing about me. Why should I listen to you?
5. You use a single name (probably fake), have no photo, no biog, no profile, the comment itself is general enough to be a standard response and couched as an ad hominem insult. Why should I listen to you?
6. You are therefore probably either a bot or a paid agitator. Why should I listen to you?