Did you see that the Labour Party has said that it will have a 100-day "security sprint" if elected on 4 July?
The review would bring together MI5, the police, and civil service to identify emerging threats
What are these “emerging threats” that so concern Starmer and his mob?
Well, I fear that could mean you and me!
He says that he is going to use MI5, the Police and the Civil Service to tell him where threats are to be found and it should be obvious to anyone reading this that each of these organisations is hostile to freedom, to patriots and to a sovereign British State.
The Civil Service is particularly malignant, it is in essence the Deep State. It never gets elected yet it wields enormous and perpetual power. It feigns as being there to serve us but in fact it wants to control us. It has been to the fore in OPPOSING any attempt to control migration, it has been HOSTILE to the realisation of Brexit and it continues to play to the globalist narrative as we saw during COVID tyranny times. The same can be said of the Police who have shown themselves in their true colours these past years when they enforced the removal of of freedoms during Lockdowns. These days they patrol social media to find hurty tweets rather than actually try to solves real crime. Who do YOU think the Police would name as “threats”? Finally we get to MI5 and here again, as has been apparent of decades, can anyone assert this organisation is capable of doing good? The Three letter agencies are just another cold dead hand of authoritarianism.
So when Starmer gets his report back from these deep state institutions - what will he find? I suggest that he will “discover” that there are “extreme right wing trouble-makers” which may even verge on terrorism that need to be tackled without further ado. (To balance this, he will also find a small number of militant Islamists that need reviewed) These people are all guilty of thought crime because they do not go with the narrative. They demand that borders be enforced, that gender reality is upheld and that the rule of law is applied equally. Holding views like this will make a person liable to criminalisation. They will be seen as revolutionaries by the incoming regime and as such they must be dealt with robustly.
However there are still many such people in the UK who refuse to abandon their patriotic instincts and I wonder if Starmer might decide to take robust action against them by imposing some variant of Martial Law?
If you think that idea is far-fetched, I would remind you that it was Starmer himself who wanted the Lockdowns to be harder and longer. Never underestimate the authoritarian instincts of the regressive Left! I also think that as the drums of war continue to beat loudly, Starmer might use the subterfuge of an external threat to the UK (Russia, inevitably) to justify a removal of our freedom of movement?
It's bleak, but Starmer's wife is Jewish,which means his children are too. If he has daughters, their children will be jewish as well. The only chink of light is whether he would do anything to put them at risk.