Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Simon Neale's avatar

I attended a public meeting about the Assisted Dying Bill, in our local cathedral last year. A woman there had been a secretary to a high Court Judge, and made the point that you can't just book a judge's time at short notice - they are extremely busy and need lots of time to prepare for cases. But short notice is what the Bill requires, as the patients will be dead if left to wait.

Nor can you select a panel of judges who keep part of their timetable free for assisted dying cases; that would lead to the situation like in the early days of legalised abortions, where some doctors became the go-to "specialists", with a stack of signed forms and would nod them through.

Clearly, unless Dead-beater is totally stupid, she would have known this, or parliamentary lawyers would have pointed it out to her. So I think this was procedurally planned from the outset. Make it look as nice and foolproof as possible, and then remove safeguards as the Bill progresses.

Life and death decisions made by social workers and approved "experts", eh? What could possibly go wrong?

Expand full comment
Cheryl Freeman's avatar

So the slippery slope wasn't a conspiracy after all. Imagine my shock.

Have a look at Richard D Hall's investigation into Jo Cox's murder.

https://www.richplanet.net/richp_genre.php?ref=251&part=1&gen=1

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts