37 Comments
User's avatar
SJAB's avatar

Yes,that was the hidden meaning with the ‘postcode’ thing. People still fall for it. Its a mystery.

Steve Boronski's avatar

We heard that Boris was stopping the boats, he didn’t.

We heard that Starmer would smash the gangs, he didn’t.

Now Andy Pandy says the same and expects us to believe him.

Liars one and all.

There are no gangs, there are NGOs taxpayer funded who have been seen facilitating this.

Listen to the latest Reform podcast.

Mr Nobody's avatar

Absolutely, 100% State sponsored, with NGO’s doing the work. The logistics behind it, is beyond just random gangs.

Sara's avatar

Liars need to be sacked and loose their pension pots, look at how much they are fleecing tax payers for their benefit (an example of a paracite) in conjunction with their invaders!

Tax payers are still believing their bs and being abused!

Jan bee's avatar

A rapist in every postcode 🤬

Julia Ni Lochlainn's avatar

The utter slop these charlatans are throwing at the people of our nations is depressing. They have no knowledge, no experience, no capability and are simply trotted out to read a script(with or without matching spectacles-and there's no point in pretending to improve their eyesight when they are literally closing their eyes and instructing everyone else to act as if they are blind too)

David Vance's avatar

So true. It’s beyond embarrassing

Sara's avatar

It is criminal - the names and addresses of those globalists need to become common knowledge as in name and shame, at the same time their invaders can call on them for a roof over their heads. Their muppets are so moronic.

John's avatar

There are less boats coming. Ok theyre bigger and carry more people and the numbers of migrants per day since Burnham got in is higher than Starmer and is at record levels. But the boat numbers are down 👍🏻😂🤣

Sara's avatar

Their semantics will hang them hopefully.

Sara's avatar

That sums it up perfectly - and the idiots think we haven't worked it out.

Kat Harvey's avatar

Stop the RNLI and Border Force assisting them. These migrants have put to sea with the intention of requiring a rescue service and breaking a national border illegally. So, the International Law of the Sea may not be applied. Leave them. If they run out of fuel, leave them. If storms blow up, leave them. If they cry, leave them. There probably will be casualties, leave them. They are a danger to us because they want our money and our country. Don’t feel sorry for them. Leave them. The boats will stop.

David Vance's avatar

Spot on, Kat.

Kat Harvey's avatar

It’s not a sentiment. Quite the reverse. It is a legal question of whether or not a crime is being committed with intent. This is not a subjective test, as it does not require anyone to assess the “worth” of anyone else, nor is it for the RNLI to decide. They will be under orders. The decision is already made for them and we can all recognise these distinctive dinghies.

Consider also the alternative, which is the Reform party policy to put the Royal Navy out there. What will they be instructed to do? Pick up the offenders like the RNLI? Use armed Royal Marines in dinghies? Ram them? Just point the guns at them? You see, it’s a minefield of equal dangers and will bring international disrepute on our Royal Navy which it has never incurred before. No, inaction is the best action and have the Army trucks waiting for them if they land.

Jeremy Wickins's avatar

I understand the sentiment, but I can't back it. It is not for emergency services to decide who is and who isn't worthy of saving.

Eva's avatar

So the people of this country are not worth saving? Because that’s what it comes down to.

Jeremy Wickins's avatar

I really do understand the point, but it is not ethical for first responders to decide who is and who isn't worthy of rescue. It would be impractical, too - how is a rescue boat to know the history of any particular boat in distress? Also, think of the political ramifications if just one boat is mistakenly denied rescue. I maintain, and will always maintain, that this is not something that can be put on the shoulders of *those whose lives are dedicated to saving other lives*. The decision of what happens to the rescued comes downstream of the rescue itself.

Kat Harvey's avatar

As I pointed out before, it is not for the first responders to decide. If a boat is recognised as not an emergency but a deliberate ploy to break borders then the decision is already made. Also the word

“worthy” is inappropriate and misleading. This is not a matter of “worth” with its shades of victimhood. It is nothing to do with “worth” at all. Qualification and worth are different issues. They may not qualify no matter what their “worth”.

Jeremy Wickins's avatar

I disagree. The word "worthy" is exactly the correct word. Any lives at risk are an emergency regardless of how it came about. Yes, the small and not-so-small boats are an example of weaponising our compassion against us, but the problem lies not in the RNLI's longstanding mission to save those in peril on the sea, but in the political weakness of successive governments. My solution is properly guarded internment camps for anyone arriving without proper documentation, and rapid deportation. No-one arriving on a small boat should be in Britain - they have passed through multiple safe countries before they get to the Channel, so they are de facto and de jure here illegally the moment they cross the 12 mile limit.

Kat Harvey's avatar

Jeremy, I agree with you about internment entirely and feel this would have been a better solution from the start.

This issue is prompted by Reform wanting to send out the Royal Navy. It would cause immense difficulties for everyone concerned. At first, I thought it sounded like a good idea but of course actively threatening and killing supposed refugees is unthinkable, even if they are not really refugees and are challenging our borders.

It is a better solution imho, to do nothing until they land and then round them up. It would require a 24 hour watch but that is not difficult today. The problem is the do-gooding people who set out to rescue them which directly encourages more illegals to give it a go. It is not a question of “worth”, that digresses from the point.

G Peel's avatar

The ONLY women and children this government should be concerned about are ours! The ones who are future victims of violent rape attacks by the very men they continue to let in.

Additionally, the very few women and children who do board a dinghy in France are desperate- as the chances of them being thrown overboard are real…. they are just bait to the disgusting men on these boats.

Sara's avatar

Well said and it is state sanctioned because they are deliberate aiding and abetting them.

Sara's avatar

I tried to delete this comment to retype due to spelling.

Have tried to several times before on Substack and same thing happens it keeps saying there is an error in deleting! Sometimes later if was tried it would delete no problem.

Are Substack making sure they record everything for the thought police?!

Because if so an alternative is needed.

Hellish 2050's avatar

Primarily working class areas have been affected. Once the middle class are affected something might be done. Burnham may come to regret this move.

The opposition to Islam will become effective when middle class daughters are raped

https://hellish2050.substack.com/p/the-opposition-to-islam-will-become

BillyO's avatar

I will restate my premise that the UK, having rid itself of Biden/Starmer, has now been forced (by politics) to deal with your Kamala Harris/Burnham!

jon's avatar

Great article, It was pleasing to see Meibion Glyndwr are still active and have helped put a stop to the Gronant migrants homes there. Government take note there are groups out there who will use violence to stop the migrants.

Nonoptional Advice's avatar

Wow

Only 755 men on the boats since 2018. I would have thought it might be a little more? Perhaps 75.5%?

David Vance's avatar

Typo. 75%.

Angela Lord's avatar

I feel a Civil War is just around the corner. We are not as green as we are cabbage looking and in a minute this appalling government is about to realise this.

Christian's avatar

I think we can agree that most people can see the problems.

What we need are realistic, humane solutions.

I’m yet to read or hear anyone put one forward.

BillyO's avatar

Stop them, board them and move all inhabitants onto a British vessel that heads DIRECTLY back to France. Why do the French get a pass? In America (after the disaster of the Biden Administration) President Trump forced Mexico to absorb everyone trying to cross the border. This forced Mexico to strictly enforce who could transit their Country and to deal with citizens who simply wanted to cross into America. Your only avenue is to stop the flow! You are ALLOWING France to set the terms of British immigration.

Christian's avatar

It's hard to bully a nuclear power.