King Charles really is the worst possible Monarch and it seems to me the sooner his reign ends the better. It’s not just his embrace of the WEF and the “Great Reset” that so offends but also his rampant enthusiasm for the Malthusian David Attenborough, and his total supine weakness in the face of creeping Wokeness.
New diversity initiatives, as detailed in the Royal Collection Trust's annual report, mark a deliberate effort from the Palace to pander to the Woke. Central to this drive are events such as the first Open Iftar meal during Ramadan at Windsor Castle in March, hosting 360 guests with prayers in St George’s Hall. 1000 years of history and then this abomination. Islam inside the citadel.
Then there was LGBT+ History Month lecture at the King’s Gallery exploring “queer artists like Leonardo da Vinci and Oscar Wilde in the royal collection”
Here is how the Palace greeted LGBT+ month!
“Join us as we mark LGBT+ History Month and celebrate the lives and work of some of the LGBTQ+ figures represented within the Royal Collection.
Assistant Curator of Prints and Drawings Alice de Quidt will share a diverse range of stories, exploring themes of love, desire, identity and personal expression connected with these artists, authors, sculptors and photographers.
Why is it important to discuss Queer history?
Focusing on the stories of Queer artists and authors allows us to view their work in a different light. LGBTQ+ people and their experiences have often been rewritten out of history, but diverse forms of love and identity have always existed. By talking about this diversity, we can champion Queer history, ensure it isn’t forgotten and create a sense of community.
How do we know these figures were Queer?
Many of the individuals mentioned in this talk would not have described themselves as LGBTQ+, the terminology did not exist during their lifetimes. However, their letters, poetry and diaries give us a clear sense their desires and identities. In some instances, we are also able to use legal and medical documents to gain a wider understanding.
Utterly pathetic stuff. As Head of the Church, King Charles should not be sponsoring “Queer” anything. Where are the alleged Christian values? He is an absolute FRAUD and a pale shadow of his mother, Queen Elizabeth.
Increasing the number of ethnic staff is also a big objective and this now being ramped up. Of those offered new seasonal roles at Buckingham Palace last year, 45 per cent were from minority ethnic backgrounds.
And in another instance…in case you missed
King Charles panders to modernity and takes the wrong advice on almost every issue. As someone who has been a Monarchist all my life I am embarrassed by him and I don’t think I am the only one. It’s not that I want a political head of State but I fear the head of the Royal Family is unfit to wear the Crown.
*** If you enjoy my work here, can I ask you to consider becoming a PAID subscriber, it’s only £5 a month, you can cancel if you don’t enjoy it but I know you will. I want to thank the kind people who already do this, without your help this becomes impossible. Thank you in anticipation of your support***
Was there a special section devoted to Sir Anthony Blunt?
Couldn’t agree more with you, David! As regards the “Queer” element, most people that I know who are gay want nothing more than to be treated as ordinary. This whole month of making them a separate entity purely because of their sexual direction irritates them. They have legal marriage now, so let it rest, is their attitude. Who wants to admire Leonardo just because he might or might not have been homosexual? It’s such rubbish!
As for the globalist and racial issue, the need to be seen as Head of the Commonwealth is the usual excuse of abandoning the British people. Most of the Commonwealth is white, English speaking though. The treatment of Lady Susan Hussey is still a bugbear of mine. That was such a disgrace.
I believe he became a convert to Islam in the 1980s but we don’t have cast iron proof - YET. Perhaps Tom Bower or other biographers might know. The moment that comes out he’s finished as King!
Charles is, as usual, out-of-date, out-of-step, slightly sneaky, gauche and trying too hard. He just annoys everyone. Who takes him seriously? No one now. Even his knighthoods are treated with derision. Whatever he does next is immaterial, he has blotted his copybook beyond repair. History will right him off as Woke and Weak.