Peaceful yet mostly murderous Welsh SchoolBoy
Well, it all happened yesterday! Just as Donald Trump started to restore sanity to the White House, we finally got to the truth as regards the savage slaughter of these three little girls in Southport last summer. Remember their names and how their families must feel. Bebe King, Elsie Dot Stancombe and Alice da Silva Aguia
Meet their killer - Axel Rudakubana.
His trial started yesterday and in a move that surprised everyone, the defendant, who was 17 at the time of the attack, admitted their murders as well as the attempted murders of eight other children, who cannot be named for legal reasons, class instructor Leanne Lucas and businessman John Hayes.
Guilty on all charges and awaiting sentencing this Thursday. He will most likely get life in prison, an entirely inadequate sentence. This is not certain because ordinarily the Life Sentence is not given to someone under the age of 21. Maybe he will get to meet some of the patriots who protested his murders, some of whom languish behind bars?
Following his guilty plea, new details have emerged about Rudakubana, including that he had shown violent behaviour at school and had been referred to the counter-extremism scheme three times
This NEW reality contrasts with what the scumbag media tried to tell us at the time. He was initially “a Welsh boy” who was in the choir. Then we discovered that actually was a 2nd generation Rwandan migrant with a key interest in Al Qaeda.
He was additionally charged on 29 October with production of a biological toxin, namely ricin, contrary to Section 1 of the Biological Weapons Act 1974; and possessing information, namely a pdf file entitled “Military Studies in the Jihad Against the Tyrants: The Al-Qaeda Training Manual” of a kind likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism, contrary to Section 58 of the Terrorism Act 2000.
There has been a LOT of spinning by the British government this morning including pushing the notion that Counter terrorism “failed to notice” the danger Rudakubana constituted!
Counter-terrorism did not "fail to notice" Rudakubana or "fail to view him as a risk." Rudakubana tried an attack on his old school the week before before the Southport mass killing. He was apprehended by police in a taxi on route to the school after his father reported him missing. And they sent him BACK HOME. A week later, he butchered three girls and maimed 10 other people. This isn't a mistake. It is either chronic incompetence or it is intentional.
You decide.
All of this would have been known by the Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer last August but I guess he was too busy overseeing the imprisonment of patriots. Starmer has been quick to rush to the media today to explain that he HAD to stay silent so as not to prejudice the Trial or bring about a contempt of court. The deeper truth is he KNEW all this, branded the protests “far-right” and lavished £££’s on the UK Muslim community. Starmer is also trying to spin the idea that Rudakubana was just “violent” but not in pursuance of any ideology. In other words he is desperate to cover the Islam link. Why? You decide.
Yes, just as I thought, a gimmegrunt! The headline is a stinking twisted lie! The person who wrote that is just as twisted! Sick
"He was apprehended by police in a taxi on route to the school after his father reported him missing. And they sent him BACK HOME. A week later, he butchered three girls and maimed 10 other people. This isn't a mistake. It is either chronic incompetence or it is intentional."
In a sense, I have every sympathy with the police and "Prevent". They were doing their best, but didn't have the resources to correctly determine the seriousness of this case, nor to act appropriately.
And there we have the nightmare behind Starmer's current bout of lawyerly outrage, and the reason why we shouldn't get hung up on who said what and who knew what. We are an advanced wealthy society with a police force, MI5, and a "Prevent" scheme tailored specifically to prevent this type of thing from happening. Yet the scale of the threat from radicalised immigrants and their offspring is so vast that they are only able to do a cursory, box-ticking job. The British State is simply not up to the task of keeping us safe from those it has allowed to come unchecked into our country. It has been forced to give up, and to concentrate instead on telling us that we are mistaken if we think that immigration is behind any of our problems.
Sure, heads may roll, and there will be pockets of lazy incompetent officials, as per any government department. But this is essentially about a far bigger problem. We imported the Third World, so that's what we now have. Rwanda? Seriously? What did they expect? Without the benefits of Empire, we have maintained our Edwardian role as the world's policeman, but by *insourcing* their criminals.