The Monstrous Evil of the “Mansion tax”!

Let me put a radical suggestion to you

Perhaps you don’t really ever own your home at all?

Is it possible that what you actually own is permission from the State to occupy it — permission which lasts only for as long as you continue paying whatever taxes politicians decide to impose upon it.

Because that, surely, is the logic behind Labour’s much vaunted new “Mansion Tax”

Starting in 2028, homes valued above £2 million in England face an additional annual council tax surcharge. This is cheered on by the Labour backbenchers who are marinated in the politics of Envy. The BBC seems to like it as does the leftist intelligentsia. Soak the Rich works in so many ways!

And naturally, of course, we’re told not to worry.

It’s only the rich people that will have to pay it and it’s only the most expensive houses. It’s only the mansions. It’s only those filthy millionaires.

Well, I think we have ALL heard this tune before.

But before we even discuss who SHOULD pay it, let’s ask a much more fundamental question:

Why should this tax exist at all?

How do you buy a home in the first place? Well, first of all you have to work hard and when you do along comes Government to tax your income. Then you choose to save what’s left. After some time, maybe even years, you buy a house and the Government potentially takes another enormous slice through Stamp Duty.

You then start paying your mortgage. and of course you insure the property. You maintain it, probably improve it. Then you pay Council Tax every single year.

And after perhaps thirty years of doing all that, you finally pay off the mortgage.

Wonderful news you may think. The house is yours. Except apparently it isn’t.

Because now the Government can now look at the current value of your property and say:

You’ve done rather well there. We’d like some more money. Every year.

This is naked communism. Institutional theft. Truly monstrous and exactly what the Left likes to do.

Government has now revealed some of the characteristics that the valuation will take into account.

Got a conservatory? Kerching.

Got a Garage? Kerching!

Got a balcony? Kerching!

Got a Swimming pool?Kerching!

Got a pleasing view? Kerching!

Just consider the joyless authoritarian mindset driving this.

You open your blinds in the morning, look across some beautiful countryside and somewhere in Whitehall somebody apparently sees not beauty but taxable value.

And we’re supposed to regard this as normal.

I don’t. Do you?

Because a home is not an income. If you bought a house decades ago as I did and its value has subsequently soared, you haven’t necessarily received one penny. You might easily be sitting in a £2 million property while living on a relatively modest retirement income. So what exactly are you supposed to do when the new annual demand comes in?

Sell the house? Borrow against it? Raid your savings?

This is all because politicians have decided that the notional value of the roof over your head makes you sufficiently wealthy to be tapped for even more money.

And don’t fall for the oldest political trick in the book:

“It won’t affect you.”

That is how these things always start, Pick a small unpopular minority.

Call them rich. Give the tax a clever name.“Mansion Tax.” Who is going to feel sorry for somebody living in a mansion?

But £2 million is simply just a number selected by politicians. There is nothing sacred about it.

Once the machinery exists, what stops a future Chancellor changing the number?

£2 million becomes £1.5 million. Then £1 million.

Or perhaps they simply freeze the threshold while property prices gradually drag more homes into the net. Fiscal drag can be very helpful for avaricious politicians.

Governments adore thresholds for precisely this reason. Inflation can do the dirty work for them.

And this is why somebody sitting in a £400,000 house should care about a tax initially aimed at a £2 million house. The threshold is temporary. The principle is permanent.

Once we concede that government has the right to impose an additional annual charge because your home has become “too valuable”, we’ve conceded the important argument.

Everything afterwards is merely negotiation over the price.

There is something deeply rotten at the heart of this.

I mean all Politicians lecture us endlessly about aspiration. Work harder. Save. Invest. Build wealth. Improve your home. Leave something to your children.

Fine words.

But actually succeed and suddenly the language changes.

Now you’re wealthy. Now you have “broad shoulders.” Now you must “pay your fair share.”

But how many times must you pay your fair share on the same money?

When you earn it? When you spend it? When you invest it? When you buy your home? When that home rises in value? And finally, when you die?

At what point does the State say:

The answer is apparently never.

Because Britain is becoming dangerously comfortable with the idea that private wealth is simply public money the Government hasn’t taxed yet.

Your savings. Your pension. Your investments. Your inheritance. Your home.

All waiting for the Chancellor to find another way of taking a slice.

I absolutely reject this as an abomination.

Private property isn’t a loophole tolerated by government. It is foundational to a free society.

If you bought your home, paid your taxes and paid your mortgage, then the principle should be simple: It belongs to you.

Not to the Treasury. Not the council. To You.

And whether your house is worth £200,000 or £20million doesn’t change that principle. So when you hear “Mansion Tax”, don’t picture a billionaire beside a swimming pool.

Picture your own front door.

Because today’s mansion can simply be redefined tomorrow.

And that’s the uncomfortable truth behind all this.

You bought the house. You paid the mortgage. You maintained it. You paid the taxes.

Yet the State still believes it deserves a continuing share of it.

This so-called Mansion Tax due in 2028 should be repealed in 2029.

We own our homes and Government should stay the hell away from us.

Please take a moment to support my work

I publish regular political analysis, overlooked history, book reviews and original commentary that you won’t find in the mainstream media.

Free subscribers receive every article I publish.

Paid subscribers receive everything above, plus The Saturday Briefing — my exclusive weekly analysis launching this September. Each edition will pull together the week’s most important political developments, highlight stories the mainstream media has ignored, and explain what they really mean.

If you value independent journalism and want to help support my work, I’d be delighted to have you on board.