Once upon a time, I subscribed to the Economist. I had taken my University degree in Economics and way back then, I saw it as a good information source. Perhaps I was wrong or perhaps like so much else it changed over the decades but I now see it as a globalist rag, a propaganda platform for the blob and an entirely disreputable publication.
Take a look at the current edition which features Sir Keir Starmer as Winston Churchill. Isn’t it perverse? I need hardly point out that Churchill helped DEFEND our borders and protect our people whilst Starmer leaves the UK wide open and exposes the British people to third world savagery.
Facts have nothing to with this though. The Economist wants you to see Starmer as a once in a lifetime wartime leader who will save the world by … starting WW3?
Starmer is the human rights lawyer who is turning the UK into a Police State; where people go to jail for posting memes; where the State can snoop on your iCloud; where the right of foreign rapists trump those of their victims and where war is the aim of his administration, possible conscription looming down the track.
Churchill made allies with the US and the Soviet Union to defeat the threat of Hitler. Starmer wants to see war AGAINST Russia and seems to reject the USA and pivot to the EU in pursuance of unwinnable forever war,
Usual pathetic guff by the msm - Starmer should be tried for treason. To add insult to injury he removed the Churchill portraits from parliament and barefaced lied to Trump - a man who has restored the Churchill bust in the Oval Office. How anyone can see the pathetic lying little worm Starmer as like Churchill is beyond belief.
Starmer is demonic leading Uk during the Time of the Demon. There is no other way to look at it. I share your thoughts and experience of the Economist. Its Fish Wrap.