I noticed that the Daily Mail ran this as their lead news story this morning!
OK, so it’s just the usual pro-Kensington Palace spin machine being deliberately spread across the world, but there is ONE interesting new claim in it….
Although there has been no official update on her health since, The Mail understands that the princess has been seen out and about more with her family in recent weeks, which will be taken as a positive sign by many. However earlier this week Kensington Palace stressed that she very much still needs time and space to recover.
So she has been seen “out and about” then?
By whom? Where exactly ? When? Why are there zero photographs of these alleged outings? I don’t believe a word of this, do you? If Princess Catherine WAS genuinely recovering, why would they hide her from us? If these visits are seen as “a positive sign” why is there zero photographic evidence? They must know that were we to see such we would be reassured that she is well so there is a conscious decision to withhold them. But that assumes she is carrying out such visits in the first place!
I know I keep writing about these Royal inconsistencies but I don’t think we should lose all critical perspective just because Royals are involved, do you? As I have said from the get go, we ALL want to see a healthy Princess Catherine but the truth is that the last fully verified images of her relate to 25th December 2023.
All very strange.
Im going with 3 theories.
The first one is she has cancer and will appear next year cured thanks to Modernas mRNA cancer injection or similar from Pfizer etc
The second one, shes dead and the palace have no idea how to get out of the current situation.
The third, she genuinely has cancer that has affected her appearance, and doesnt want the public to see her in her current condition.
It's like when was the last independent sighting of Madeleine McCann. It was the Sunday 29 April at around 1.30pm, by the way. But that's another story. See Richard D Hall's four part documentary.